news & updates

Almeida Law Group welcomes David McGee as Of Counsel, bringing with him years of experience litigating and obtaining relief for consumers in a wide range of cases, including college ranking fraud, defamation and false advertising.

On October 20, 2025, in B.K. and N.Z. v. Eisenhower Medical Center, Case No. 5:23-cv-02092-JGB-DTB, the United States District Court for the Central District of California granted final approval of a class action settlement resolving claims that Eisenhower Medical Center unlawfully disclosed patient data through website tracking technologies.

Learn about the Flo Health lawsuit and Meta’s privacy violations. Almeida Law Group explains what this landmark ruling means for consumer rights.

The Circuit Court for the County of Wayne, Michigan has granted final approval of the class action settlement in McClain v. Henry Ford Health, Case No. 25-000801-CZ, resolving claims that Henry Ford Health disclosed sensitive patient data through pixel tracking technologies.

The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Missouri has granted preliminary approval of a $3.25 million class action settlement in In re: CHROME HOLDING CO. (f/k/a 23ANDME HOLDING CO.), Case No. 25-40976-357.

Judge Murillo denied Walmart’s motion to compel arbitration in R.C. v. Walmart Inc., Case No. 5:24-cv-02003-SRM-DTB alleging unauthorized disclosure of sensitive health-related purchase data through website tracking technologies.

Almeida Law Group secured final approval of a class action settlement in W.M.F. and Marden v. LifeMD, Inc., Case No. A-24-906800-C.

Almeida Law Group successfully defeated a motion to dismiss in Vriezen v. Infinite Health Collaborative, P.A. d/b/a Twin Cities Orthopedics, Case No. 0:24-cv-03743-NEB-DJF, allowing key patient privacy claims to proceed under federal and state law.

A coalition of law firms—Almeida Law Group LLC, Tycko & Zavareei LLP, Cutter Law P.C., and Weitz & Luxenberg PC—has filed a class action lawsuit against Thrillzz Inc., a Tennessee-based company operating mobile gambling applications and websites, for allegedly conducting illegal online sports betting in violation of California law.

Almeida Law Group, along with Cutter Law P.C., Tycko & Zavareei LLP, and Weitz & Luxenberg PC, filed an opposition to Defendant’s motion to dismiss in Zhen et al. v. DraftKings, Inc., Case No. 3:25-cv-04618-CRB, challenging the legality of DraftKings’ fantasy sports contests under California law.

The Superior Court of California has granted final approval of a class action settlement involving nearly 60,000 patients whose sensitive data was allegedly exposed through tracking technologies used by San Diego Fertility Center and Ivy Fertility Services.

Almeida Law Group secured final approval of a class action settlement in Smith v. Loyola University Medical Center, Case No. 1:23-cv-15828.

Almeida Law Group, along with Cutter Law P.C., Tycko & Zavareei LLP, and Weitz & Luxenberg PC, filed an opposition to Defendant’s motion to dismiss in Franks et al. v. SidePrize LLC d/b/a PrizePicks, Case No. 3:25-cv-04916-CRB, challenging the legality of PrizePicks’ fantasy sports contests under California law.

Almeida Law Group is proud to share that Partner Wesley M. Griffith has been selected to the 2025 California Super Lawyers list, a prestigious honor awarded to only the top 5% of attorneys statewide.

Judge J.P. Boulee of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia denied in part the motion to dismiss in Doe v. Wellstar Health System, Inc., Case No. 1:24-cv-01748-JPB, allowing claims for unjust enrichment and violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act to proceed.

Judge Mark W. Pedersen of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York granted final approval of the class action settlement in Kane v. University of Rochester, Case No. 6:23-cv-6027-MJP, resolving claims over alleged unauthorized disclosures of patient data.

The Honorable Robin Schmidt granted final approval of a class action settlement in Tambroni v. WellNow Urgent Care, P.C., Case No. 2025LA000013, resolving claims related to a data security incident that exposed the personal information of nearly 600,000 individuals.

Judge Johnson Coleman denied Midwest Express Care’s motion to dismiss in a class action led by Almeida Law Group, allowing claims related to the unauthorized disclosure of patient data to proceed.

Judge Jacobson granted preliminary approval of a class action settlement in Mrozinski v. Aspirus, Inc., No. 2023CV000170, appointing Almeida Law Group’s Managing Partner, David S. Almeida, as Settlement Class Counsel in litigation concerning the alleged unauthorized disclosure of patient data to third parties.

On August 5, 2025, Elena A. Belov was appointed Interim Co-Lead Counsel in the Nadeau et al. v. Onsite Mammography, LLC d/b/a Onsite Women’s Health, No. 3:25-cv-11123-MGM, data breach case.

On June 13, 2025, Judge Michael T. Mullen appointed Elena A. Belov as Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel in the consolidated Medical Express Ambulance Service data breach litigation, Case No. 2025CH04441.

On May 16, 2025, Judge Evan Jones appointed Elena A. Belov as Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel in the consolidated In re: Mt. Baker Imaging, LLC Data Security Litigation, Case No. 25-2-00463-37.

On July 21, 2025, Chief Judge Beth Phillips appointed leadership counsel in the Cerner/Oracle Data Breach Litigation (Case No. 25-cv-00259), including Elena Belov to the Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee, marking a key step in coordinating efforts to protect affected individuals.

On July 9, 2025, Judge Jerry W. Blackwell of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota granted final approval to a class action settlement in In Re: Group Health Plan Litigation, where Almeida Law Group and co-counsel represented the class alleging that Group Health Plan, Inc. d/b/a

Almeida Law Group announces a major legal victory in Aliff v. California FAIR Plan Association, Case No. 21STCV20095. On June 24, 2025, the Honorable Stuart M. Rice of the Los Angeles Superior Court granted in part Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Adjudication, ruling that several core provisions of California FAIR Plan’s

A coalition of leading consumer protection law firms has filed four class action lawsuits in California federal court against FanDuel, DraftKings, PrizePicks, and Underdog Fantasy, alleging that the companies’ daily fantasy sports (“DFS”) contests constitute illegal gambling under California law.

On June 25, 2025, U.S. District Judge Nelson S. Román largely denied a motion to dismiss in Pattison v. Teladoc Health, Inc.

Almeida Law Group is in the news! Read more about our feature in Captain Compliance regarding ALG’s successes in litigating ECPA violations.

On June 17, 2025, Circuit Judge Gail L. Noll granted preliminary approval of a class action settlement in Donnelly v. Aspen Dental Management, Inc.

On June 16, 2025, a District Court judge granted preliminary approval of a class action settlement in Cooper v. Mount Sinai Health System, Inc. A final approval hearing is scheduled for Friday, October 24, 2025, at 2:30 p.m.

The Almeida Law Group LLC is extremely pleased to announce the opening of its Southern California office, marking another milestone in its continued expansion throughout California. This addition complements the Firm’s existing Sacramento location and strengthens its ability to serve clients throughout the state.

On June 11, 2025, U.S. District Judge Lawrence E. Kahn granted final approval of a class action settlement in In re Practice Resources, LLC Data Security Breach Litigation.

On June 4, 2025, a Nevada judge granted preliminary approval to a class action settlement in W.M.F. & Matthew Marden v. LifeMD, Inc., which, if finalized, will provide cash or vouchers to class members whose private information was allegedly disclosed to third-party AdTech companies via tracking tools on LifeMD’s websites.

On June 4, 2025, the Almeida Law Group secured preliminary approval for an $875,000 class action settlement in B.K. v. Eisenhower Medical Center, addressing claims that Eisenhower Medical Center used tracking technologies to disclose sensitive health information to third parties.

Almeida Law Group is in the news! Read more about our involvement in the WellNow Urgent Care Data Breach Settlement.

On May 27, 2025, Judge Kathleen M. McCarthy of the Circuit Court for the County of Wayne, Michigan granted preliminary approval of a class action settlement in McClain v. Henry Ford Health.

On May 14, 2025, U.S. District Judge David A. Ezra denied Onnit Labs’ motion to dismiss a class action lawsuit alleging the company violated the Video Privacy Protection Act by sharing users’ Facebook IDs and video viewing histories with Meta without consent.

Judge Jeremy C. Daniel granted preliminary approval of a $2,665,264.00 class action settlement in Smith v. Loyola University Medical Center, involving allegations of unauthorized data disclosure through healthcare website tracking technologies.

Almeida Law Group welcomes Wes Griffith as Managing Partner of its California Office. Wes brings extensive experience to the role, having spent a decade at two of the nation’s top defense firms, where he represented some of the world’s largest companies in class action lawsuits and other complex litigation.

Plaintiffs filed a class action lawsuit alleging Tyler Technologies illegally charged deceptive “junk fees” on ReserveCalifornia.com camping reservations, violating California’s Honest Pricing Act and consumer laws. Plaintiffs are represented by attorneys from Cutter Law P.C. and Almeida Law Group, LLC.

Judge Andrea R. Wood granted final approval to a $5 million class action settlement in Reedy v. Everlywell, addressing unauthorized disclosure of consumer data.

A federal court has preliminarily approved a class action settlement against the University of Rochester over allegations that it improperly shared sensitive health information with Facebook through tracking technology on its websites.

On April 2, 2025, Judge Matthew F. Kennelly approved a class action settlement in Spann v. Superior Ambulance, resolving claims related to a May 2023 data breach by providing monetary compensation to affected individuals, covering attorneys’ fees, and awarding service payments to class representatives.

In Illinois, a federal court allowed wiretap and negligence claims to move forward against Duly Health, finding that plaintiffs sufficiently alleged the unauthorized sharing of HIPAA-protected health information with Meta through tracking technologies.

A federal judge in California ruled that video privacy claims against MUBI can proceed, holding that plaintiffs plausibly alleged the company unlawfully shared users’ viewing data with Meta without proper consent, in violation of the VPPA and state privacy laws.

Almeida Law Group and Kerley Schaffer filed a motion to invalidate the FAIR Plan homeowners’ policy for the benefit of FAIR PLAN insureds recovering from wildfire damage.

Almeida Law Group welcomes Karen Dahlberg O’Connell as a partner to the firm.

A federal court approved a $578,680 settlement in Doe v. Workit Health, Inc., resolving claims that the company’s use of tracking technologies led to unauthorized disclosures of users’ confidential health information to third parties like Meta and Google.

Union Bank & Trust faces a class-action lawsuit over a data breach exposing 200,000+ individuals’ information. Plaintiffs seek compensation and privacy protections.

Judge Steven C. Seeger allowed key privacy and negligence claims to proceed in a class action, represented by Almeida Law Group, against Edward-Elmhurst Health.

The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California denied Exer Urgent Care’s motion to dismiss most claims in a privacy class action.

On January 13, 2025, a federal judge denied Prime Healthcare’s motion to dismiss a class action alleging it used website tracking tools to share patients’ protected health information without consent.

Almeida Law Group files three class actions in California against healthcare entities for allegedly sharing patients’ health data without consent.

Two class action lawsuits against CityMD over alleged data sharing have been consolidated. A Consolidated Complaint is due January 2025, as litigation progresses.

David Almeida is the Co-Lead Counsel in a class action over the Rockford Gastroenterology data breach affecting sensitive patient information.

Everlywell faces a $5M class action settlement over alleged data privacy violations. Find out if you’re eligible for compensation before the April 29, 2025 hearing.

Everlywell faces a class action lawsuit for allegedly sharing private health data with Facebook and Google through website tracking pixels.

Atrium Health faces a class action lawsuit for allegedly sharing patient data with Facebook and Google through Meta Pixel without proper disclosure.

David Almeida has been appointed Co-Lead Counsel in the class action lawsuit against Teladoc Health, Inc., advocating for consumer rights.