Class Action Settlements

If you think you might be a class member in one of these cases, click the “Go To Claim Website” link on the cards below to learn more and to submit a claim if you meet the eligibility criteria.

All Settlements

Sort By:

Cliburn v. One Source to Market, LLC d/b/a Hexclad Cookware, Inc.

Open until 11/14/2025

A $2.5 million settlement has been proposed in a class action lawsuit against HexClad, which alleged HexClad falsely advertised, labeled, and marketed the non-stick coating of certain of its products, including, but not limited to, claims that the products were “non-toxic,” “PFAS Free,” “PFOA Free,” or otherwise free from certain chemicals. HexClad has denied any and all allegations of wrongdoing, fault, liability, or damage of any kind.

Mrozinski, et al. v. Aspirus, Inc.

Open until 12/03/2025

Aspirus, Inc. has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit alleging misuse of patient data, though it denies wrongdoing. The settlement covers anyone who logged into the Aspirus Patient Portal between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2024. Eligible patients can file a claim for payment by December 3, 2025, opt out or object by November 3, 2025, or do nothing (no payment but still bound by the settlement). Payments will be made only if the court grants final approval.

Kelly Gorder, et al., v. FCDG Management, LLC d/b/a First Choice Dental

Open until 01/26/2026

A settlement has been reached in a class action lawsuit against FCDG Management, LLC d/b/a First Choice Dental, which alleged that the company failed to adequately protect individuals’ private information, resulting in a data incident in October 2023. The incident potentially exposed sensitive personal information, including names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, driver’s license numbers, financial account numbers, and health information. First Choice Dental has denied all allegations of wrongdoing, fault, liability, or damages of any kind.

How Class Action Settlements Work?

Class action lawsuits serve incredibly important purposes. For one, they allow people to address corporate misconduct even when their individual recovery is relatively small as many class actions involve disputes over transactions involving amounts that ordinarily would not result in litigation (for instance, a dispute over the label on a $7.00 grocery item). But even though the amount involved is fairly modest, when that purchase price is combined on behalf of all persons who purchased the product in question, the case can then be appropriately litigated.

Allowing a group of people to aggregate their claims when they have experienced the same or similar harm holds corporations accountable.

This misconduct may involve:

Deceptive Business Practice
Defective Product
Data Breach
Unlawful Employment Policy