Final Approval Granted in LifeStance Data Privacy Settlement
On October 20, 2026, the Honorable Krissa M. Lanham of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona granted final approval of a $3.03 million class action settlement in Strong v. LifeStance Health Group Inc., Case No. CV-23-00682-KML.
Update: Judge Rules Curriculum Associates Must Face Claims It Shared Students’ Data With Google
On September 30, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts denied in large part the motion to dismiss in M.C. 1, et al. v. Curriculum Associates, LLC, Case No. 1:25-cv-13942-FDS. The putative class action alleges that Curriculum Associates, the maker of the i-Ready learning platform used by thousands of K-12 schools, collected students’ data and shared it with Google and other third parties without the consent of students or their parents.
Almeida Law Group Files ERISA Class Action Against Kyocera Over 401(k) Plan Mismanagement
A lawsuit filed recently alleges Kyocera Document Solutions America, Inc., its Board of Directors, and Plan Retirement Committee mismanaged the company’s 401(k) retirement plan, resulting in millions of dollars in losses to current and former employees.
Preliminary Approval Granted in Aramark Capital One Arena Fee Case
A D.C. Superior Court judge granted preliminary approval of a $4.5 million class action settlement resolving claims that Aramark charged customers an undisclosed Venue Fee on purchases at Capital One Arena.
Judge Sets “Non-Moveable” December 21 Trial to Decide Legality of DraftKings’ California Operations
A federal judge has set a nonmovable December 21 trial to decide whether DraftKings can continue operating daily fantasy sports in California. Judge Breyer signaled that an injunction could bar the game itself.
Preliminary Approval Granted in Wellstar Health Tracking Technologies Case
On July 28, 2026, in Doe v. Wellstar Health System, Inc., Case No. 1:24-cv-01748-JPB, Judge J.P. Boulee of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, granted preliminary approval of a health data privacy class action settlement.
Almeida Law Group’s Wesley Griffith Appointed Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel in Polymarket Litigation
The Almeida Law Group is pleased to announce that Wesley M. Griffith has been appointed Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel in San Diego and Yoon v. Blockratize, Inc. d/b/a Polymarket, et al., Case No. 1:26-cv-00973-MMG, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Preliminary Approval Granted in Cone Health Data Privacy Settlement
On July 7, 2026, in Singh v. Cone Health, Case No. 1:24-cv-00558-LAF-JGM, Judge Freeman of the United States District of the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina granted preliminary approval of a health data privacy class action settlement that resolved claims that Cone Health disclosed patients’ personal information through website tracking technologies.
Britany Wessan Authors Law360 Article on AI and the Rise of Settlement Objections
The Almeida Law Group is pleased to announce that Partner Britany Kabakov Wessan published an article in Law360, reflecting her expertise and thought leadership in emerging class-action issues.
Preliminary Approval Granted in LifeStance Data Privacy Case
A federal court in Arizona has granted preliminary approval of a class action settlement in Strong v. LifeStance Health Group Inc., Case No. CV-23-00682-PHX-KML. The lawsuit alleged that Lifestance Health Group failed to protect patients' sensitive personal and health from online tracking technologies.
Preliminary Approval Granted in Allina Health System Data Privacy Settlement
A federal court in Minnesota has granted preliminary approval of a class action settlement in Ahlers v. Allina Health System, Case No. 24-CV-3674 (SRN/ECW). The lawsuit alleged that Allina Health failed to protect patients' sensitive personal and health information from a data breach.
Preliminary Approval Granted in Onsight Mammography Healthcare Settlement
A federal court in California has granted preliminary approval of a class action settlement in Clarkson v. Onsight Mammography LLC, Case No. 3:25-cv-11123-MGM. The lawsuit alleged that Onsite Mammography failed to protect patients' sensitive personal and health information from a data breach.
Resourceful. Resilient. Relentless.
Contact us today to get the justice you and your family deserve.