SAN DIEGO, Calif. — January 22, 2026 — Two California consumers have filed a nationwide class action lawsuit against Costco Wholesale Corporation, alleging the retail giant has misled millions of shoppers by falsely advertising its popular Kirkland Signature Seasoned Rotisserie Chicken as containing “no preservatives,” despite formulating the product with added preservatives that extend shelf life and maintain texture.
Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, the complaint asserts that Costco has “systemically cheated customers out of tens—if not hundreds—of millions of dollars” by prominently marketing the Rotisserie Chicken as preservative free in stores and online while adding sodium phosphate and carrageenan—ingredients that function as preservatives.
Prominent “No Preservatives” Claims Allegedly Misled Shoppers
According to the lawsuit, Costco displays large instore signage and online product listings stating “No Preservatives,” without qualification.
The complaint alleges that Costco’s representations were false and misleading because sodium phosphate and carrageenan—both added to the Rotisserie Chicken—perform preservative functions by inhibiting spoilage, stabilizing proteins, and extending shelf stability.
“Consumers reasonably rely on clear, prominent claims like ‘No Preservatives,’ especially when deciding what they and their families will eat,” said California Managing Partner Wesley M. Griffith of the Almeida Law Group. “Costco’s own ingredient list contradicts its marketing. That’s unlawful, and it’s unfair.”
Consumers Increasingly Seek Transparency in Food Ingredients
The lawsuit cites industry research showing that consumers place significant weight on preservative related claims and increasingly seek “clean label” products free from artificial additives. Plaintiffs allege that Costco capitalized on this trend while concealing the true nature of its product.
Claims Under Washington and California Consumer Protection Laws
The complaint brings claims under:
- Washington Consumer Protection Act
- California Consumers Legal Remedies Act
- California Unfair Competition Law
- California False Advertising Law
Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief, restitution, damages, and disgorgement of profits Costco allegedly obtained through its misleading marketing.
Plaintiffs Say They Would Not Have Purchased the Product Had They Known the Truth
Both plaintiffs allege they would not have purchased the Rotisserie Chicken—or would have paid less—had Costco disclosed that the product contains added preservatives. They also state they intend to purchase the product again in the future if it is actually preservative free but cannot rely on Costco’s representations unless they are truthful.
News About the Case
- “Costco Under Fire As Lawsuit Targets Famous Rotisserie Chicken” – Los Angeles Magazine; Jan. 30, 2026
- “Costco Is Sued Over Preservatives in Its $5 Rotisserie Chickens” – The New York Times; Jan. 29, 2026
- “Costco sued over ‘no preservatives’ claim on its $4.99 rotisserie chicken” – San Francisco Chronicle; Jan. 29, 2026
- “Costco Faces Lawsuit Over Allegedly Mislabeling Its Kirkland Rotisserie Chicken as Having ‘No Preservatives‘” – People; Jan. 29, 2026
- “Costco sued over preservatives in its $5 rotisserie chicken” – The Seattle Times; Jan. 29, 2026
- “Costco accused of deceiving shoppers over popular $5 rotisserie chickens” – New York Post; Jan. 28, 2026
- “Costco sued over its $4.99 rotisserie chicken. Here’s why.” – USA Today; Jan. 28, 2026
- “Costco’s $4.99 rotisserie chicken gets roasted in lawsuit. Here’s what they’re claiming” – Los Angeles Times; Jan. 28, 2026
- “Why Is Costco Being Sued Over Its $4.99 Rotisserie Chicken?” – Entrepreneur; Jan. 26, 2026
- “Lawsuit says Costco’s ‘no preservatives’ claim about its popular rotisserie chickens is false” – ABC7 Eyewitness News; Jan. 23, 2026
- “Costco’s popular bargain meal at center of new lawsuit” – Fox Business; Jan. 26, 2026
- “Costco’s $4.99 chicken under fire over ‘no preservatives’ claim” – The Street; Jan. 26, 2026
- “New Costco Lawsuit Is Coming For The Store’s $5 Rotisserie Chicken” – The Takeout; Jan. 26, 2026
Update
“We are pleased to see that Costco promptly dropped its false advertising claims of ‘no preservatives’ in response to our lawsuit. It’s confirmation of our core legal theory—the ‘no preservative’ claims were false.” – Wesley M. Griffith
About Almeida Law Group
Almeida Law Group is a consumer protection and complex litigation firm with offices in California, Illinois, and New York. The firm represents plaintiffs nationwide in cases involving deceptive marketing, food labeling, toxic exposure, and corporate misconduct.
Case Information
The case is Johnston et al., vs. Costco Wholesale Corporation, et al., United States District Court for the Southern District of California. A case number has not yet been assigned. Plaintiffs are represented by California Managing Partner Wesley M. Griffith, Of Counsel David A. McGee, and Associate Loc G. Ho. They are supported on the matter by Paralegal Garrett Syke. At the time of writing, counsel information for Costco was unavailable.
Media Contact
Wesley M. Griffith
Almeida Law Group, LLC
wes@almeidalawgroup.com
5304903178